Wednesday, 7 March 2012
Wednesday, 29 February 2012
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhS8DV9bg1U5Xy0hqPwrvOY0_rC5Oy1raZCQ7r81lDz55yLP5sBcN2tqVyK29dBYBOnwlxw5GTCQQrhfaBmn5Ri-AQTztdtskwyOVnpJK17X8H1BaemUX_nzaoDdTL1R2MyGrr8FxDGnAc/s1600/pp.jpg)
Monday, 27 February 2012
Sunday, 19 February 2012
Typographic Portraits
Create a typographic self-portrait in Adobe Photoshop
Canvass Requirements:
- CMYK color mode
- 266 ppi
Investigation:
Collect a minmum of 10 typographic self portraits of various styles.
Portraits:
Choose a style and define your portrait using only text for line, value and shape. Recognizable text must be personal and not random. Consider choosing a theme and using words that fit that theme or describe your personality.
Thursday, 10 November 2011
Sunday, 30 October 2011
"Arial’s ubiquity is not due to its beauty"
Have you been fooled by an imposter? Arial hit the mainstream when windows 3.1 was released and it has become the default font by many non-designers. If you look closely, Arial (developed by Birmly in 1989) and Helvetica (developed by Haas Foundry of Switzerland in the 1950s) have a lot in common. During the 60’s Helvetica was the typographic "darling” in the design industry. During the late 80s, due to licensing issues and expense; cheaper and often less visually pleasing look-alike fonts became the standard in Microsoft applications. Arial is believed to be Helvetica's substitute. In Mark Simonson's article, "The Scourge of Arial" you will be blown away by the events that led to the demise of Helvetica. What are your thoughts?
![]() |
http://ilovetypography.com/2007/10/06/arial-versus-helvetica/ |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)